Training To Be Resilient: My Training Model
My training model aims to make you resilient in a variety of ways. It’s a concurrent model that’ll make you stronger, faster, more muscular, more agile, and fitter.
Today, I’m going to chat about the framework I use to choose exercises, build a training block, and direct training towards specific outcomes.
Firstly, I think it’s useful to establish definitions for ‘accumulation’ and ‘intensification’. These terms set the foundation for what I’m aiming to achieve from a training block.
Block 1: Accumulation
Block 2: Intensification
Block 3: Accumulation
In an accumulation block, I’m aiming to accumulate a higher volume of training than I would in an intensification block. For that reason, my training is biased towards several variables:
More eccentric focus
More submaximal, repeat-effort work/density/capacity work
More ‘hypertrophy’ in nature
A focus on longer tempos
Higher volume, lower intensity
Low/moderate rest
Light-moderate plyometric work
Conversely, in an intensification block, I aim to raise the ceiling of my maximal strength levels by lifting heavier loads or moving at faster speeds than I would in an accumulation block. As a result, my training will be biased towards other variables:
More concentric, ‘power’ focus
Speed/sprint work
Maximal strength work
Low rep/volume, higher intensity
High rest
Higher intensity plyometric work
Considering these two pathways, the variations and exercise applications I choose for each training block will look different. What has been more useful, is to categorise strength applications into primary, secondary, and tertiary movements:
Primary:
‘Main lifts’
Bilateral
Concentric focus
Maximal strength and power focus
2-10 total reps per exercise
Moderate constraint
Eg. Back Squat
Secondary:
‘Accessory lifts’
Bilateral or unilateral
Eccentric/tissue focus
Submaximal strength and hypertrophy
16-50 total reps per exercise
Eg. Single Leg Press
Tertiary:
Unilateral focus
Low constraint
Isometric or eccentric focus
Stability or proprioceptive component
Often implemented as warmups
eg. SL RDL
You’re probably beginning to see a bit of a pattern here. I now have a useful framework within which to apply exercise variations to achieve a specific outcome.
If my primary goal is volume-based, my training will likely emphasise secondary versus primary exercise variations. If my primary goal is load-based, my focus will be on primary variations.
Is this the only way to train? Absolutely not. There are a thousand ways you could implement good training. I just happen to find this framework useful and effective.
But hey - there are no hard or fast rules here. It’s just exercise after all. It’s all made up.
So: go explore, enjoy, and try whatever takes your fancy.